Denied Persons List

What the Denied Persons List actually is

The Denied Persons List, maintained by the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security, identifies individuals and entities whose export and reexport privileges have been formally revoked under the Export Administration Regulations. Someone listed on the DPL cannot export, and non-US parties on the list cannot reexport or transfer, items subject to the EAR, a genuinely severe restriction covering the full range of items the EAR regulates, not a narrower, item-specific limitation.

Not the Entity List: BIS says so directly

BIS maintains a standing FAQ specifically addressing this exact confusion, and the answer is unambiguous: no, the Denied Persons List and the Entity List are not the same, even though both are administered by the same Commerce Department office. The DPL includes parties who’ve had their export and reexport privileges denied outright. The Entity List instead imposes specific licence requirements on named parties, often, but not universally, prohibiting exports of items subject to the EAR without individual BIS authorisation, a meaningfully different, generally less absolute restriction than an outright denial of privileges.

Not the SDN List either: a different department entirely

The DPL is also frequently, and incorrectly, treated as interchangeable with OFAC’s SDN List. They aren’t the same instrument, and they aren’t even administered by the same part of government. OFAC sits within the Treasury Department and enforces financial sanctions under IEEPA and related statutes; a genuine SDN designation blocks assets and prohibits virtually all dealings with the designated party. BIS sits within the Commerce Department and enforces export controls under the EAR; a DPL listing specifically denies export privileges, a narrower legal consequence focused on trade in controlled items rather than a comprehensive financial and transactional block. A party can appear on one list without appearing on the other at all.

What “denial of export privileges” actually means

A denial order strips the listed party of the ability to participate in any export transaction involving items subject to the EAR, not merely the specific transaction that triggered the enforcement action. This typically follows a violation of export control law, and the denial period is generally fixed by the specific enforcement order rather than indefinite by default, though violations can and do result in lengthy denial periods measured in years.

The legal basis: EAR Parts 764 and 766

The Denied Persons List operates under Parts 764 and 766 of the Export Administration Regulations, the sections governing enforcement and administrative proceedings under the EAR. A process exists, described in Section 764.3(a)(2) of the EAR, for a denied party to seek authorisation to engage in specific transactions that a denial order would otherwise prohibit, meaning a DPL listing isn’t necessarily an absolute, permanent bar on every conceivable transaction indefinitely, though obtaining such authorisation requires an affirmative request and BIS approval, not an automatic exception.

The four BIS restricted party lists compared

Every one of these four is a genuinely distinct restriction, and the Consolidated Screening List brings all four together with OFAC and State Department data into a single combined reference, precisely because checking only one BIS list, or only OFAC’s data, leaves real gaps.

A real example of how these get confused in practice

The confusion between BIS’s Unverified List and its Entity List is well documented enough that legal commentators specifically flag it: a company added to the UVL, such as the memory chipmaker YMTC in 2022 during a Commerce Department investigation into possible chip sales to a sanctioned telecommunications firm, is not sanctioned or barred from doing business the way an Entity List or DPL listing would restrict, but does require additional compliance steps before a transaction involving EAR-covered items can proceed. Treating a UVL listing with the same automatic-refusal response an actual DPL denial order requires is exactly the kind of category error that both wastes legitimate business opportunity and, in the reverse case, understates real risk.

What happens if you deal with a DPL-listed party

Exporting, reexporting, or transferring EAR-covered items to a party on the Denied Persons List without authorisation is itself a violation of the EAR, independent of whatever conduct originally led to that party’s denial. This applies to the exporting party, not just the denied party; a US company that ships EAR-controlled goods to someone on the DPL faces its own direct enforcement exposure, separate from the listed party’s own restrictions.

Requesting authorisation despite a denial order

Where a legitimate business need genuinely requires engaging with a denied party in a way a denial order would otherwise prohibit, EAR Section 764.3(a)(2) sets out the process for requesting specific BIS authorisation for that transaction. This isn’t a routine exception firms should expect to obtain easily; it requires a specific, documented request and BIS’s own case-by-case approval, and firms shouldn’t assume a pending request functions as interim permission before that approval is actually granted.

Where this fits in a compliance programme

A trade compliance programme that properly incorporates the Denied Persons List screens it as a genuinely distinct check from OFAC sanctions screening, not a secondary afterthought folded into the same process: verifying counterparties against the DPL specifically wherever EAR-covered items are involved, distinguishing a DPL hit, which demands an outright block, from an Entity List or Unverified List hit, which demand a different, proportionate response, and maintaining current data given how frequently BIS updates all four of its restricted party lists independently of OFAC’s own update cycle.

Frequently asked questions

Read more: our ultimate guides, whitepapers and templates

Related guides and resources to help you act on what you just read.